Afbeelding 1 van 1
The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle Over America
Objectstaat:
5 beschikbaar
Prijs:
US $19,90
OngeveerEUR 18,48
- Nu kopenThe Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle Over America
Verzendkosten:
Bevindt zich in: Grand Rapids, Michigan, Verenigde Staten
Levering:
Geschatte levering tussen do, 9 mei en di, 14 mei tot 43230
Retourbeleid:
30 dagen om te retourneren. Verkoper betaalt voor retourzending. Details bekijken- voor meer informatie over retourzendingen
Betalingen:
Winkel met vertrouwen
Verkopergegevens
- 99,3% positive feedback
Ingeschreven als zakelijke verkoper
De verkoper neemt de volledige verantwoordelijkheid voor deze aanbieding.
eBay-objectnummer:363385952652
Specificaties
- Objectstaat
- ISBN
- 0691153000
- EAN
- 9780691153001
- Binding
- TP
- Book Title
- The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revoluti
- Publication Name
- Whites of Their Eyes : the Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle over American History
- Item Length
- 8.2in
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Series
- The Public Square Ser.
- Publication Year
- 2011
- Type
- Textbook
- Format
- Trade Paperback
- Language
- English
- Item Height
- 0.3in
- Features
- Revised
- Item Width
- 5.4in
- Item Weight
- 8 Oz
- Number of Pages
- 232 Pages
Over dit product
Product Information
Americans have always put the past to political ends. The Union laid claim to the Revolution - so did the Confederacy. Civil rights leaders said they were the true sons of liberty - so did Southern segregationists. This book tells the story of the centuries-long struggle over the meaning of the nation's founding.
Product Identifiers
Publisher
Princeton University Press
ISBN-10
0691153000
ISBN-13
9780691153001
eBay Product ID (ePID)
109024205
Product Key Features
Publication Name
Whites of Their Eyes : the Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle over American History
Format
Trade Paperback
Language
English
Features
Revised
Series
The Public Square Ser.
Publication Year
2011
Type
Textbook
Number of Pages
232 Pages
Dimensions
Item Length
8.2in
Item Height
0.3in
Item Width
5.4in
Item Weight
8 Oz
Additional Product Features
Series Volume Number
16
Lc Classification Number
E175.9.L46 2010
Edition Description
Revised Edition
Reviews
" The Whites of Their Eyes isn't a screed of any kind, and the text is refreshingly free of ire. It is, instead, a warning shot across the bow. To tea-party activists of today, Ms. Lepore seems to be saying, 'Tighten up your game.' In its current iteration, the tea-party is a feat of storytelling. But in order to gain a foothold in American politics, it must aspire to more than that."-- Molly Young, Economist.com, For both teachers and students, Lepore's meditation serves as a valuable reminder that the craft of history is inevitably a political act in which we navigate both the realities and, according to Lepore, the 'tyranny of the past.' ---Richard L. Hughes, Teaching History, "Modern Tea Partiers have thrown facts overboard and recast the Revolution in their own image: white, Christian, and ultraconservative. Lepore demolishes the Tea Party's founding fable with deep scholarship and devastating wit." --Tony Horwitz, author of Confederates in the Attic, Tackling the present, the near present, and the far-away past in one small volume, Lepore has not only penned an indictment of the Tea Party's crimes against history, she's also working in the tradition of Hofstadter, helping edge the academy closer to the public arena. And remaining a card-carrying historian, churning out intricate studies like New York Burning , Lepore has continued to step outside the safe boundaries of the ivory tower. At the risk of being accused of dilettantism, she's even tried her hand at historical fiction, co-authoring Blindspot in 2008. Now she's given journalism a go, making the case that Lepore is a better reporter than any historian, and a better historian than any reporter. ---Samuel P. Jacobs, Daily Beast, "Jill Lepore, a historian of the American Revolution and a staff writer at The New Yorker , has written a brief but valuable book, The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle Over American History , which combines her own interviews with Tea Partiers (mostly from her home state, Massachusetts) and her deep knowledge of the founders and of their view of the Constitution." --Alan Brinkley, New York Times Book Review, In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore reviews the history of the American Revolution--in order to explore, and explode, the way the 21st-century Right uses that history. She criticizes history-according-to-the-Tea-Party on two levels. First, and unsurprisingly, she finds that the Tea Party's description of the past is simply incorrect at many turns. More interesting is Lepore's second criticism. In their asking the (unanswerable) question, 'What would the Founders do?', the Tea Party invites people to have a very strange relationship with the past: 'People who ask what the founders would do quite commonly declare that they know, they know, they just know what the founders would do, and, mostly, it comes to this: if only they could see us now, they would be rolling over in their graves. . . . We have failed to obey their sacred texts, holy writ,' Lepore writes provocatively. 'That's not history. It's not civil religion, the faith in democracy that binds Americans together. It's not originalism or even constitutionalism. That's fundamentalism.' ---Lauren Winner, Books & Culture, In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore's liberal perspective is obvious although she largely sticks to history. Readers will find no exposé of an 'astroturf' movement funded by billionaire libertarians. What they will find is a trenchant, lively and devastating meditation on the uses and abuses of American history, most recently by the tea partiers. . . . Lepore counters what she assails as 'historical fundamentalism' (which, in the words of a chapter title, places 'the past upon its throne') with rich, if roaming, portraits of an American Revolution that she clearly loves. Thus, the book will have enduring value beyond the upcoming election. ---Steven P. Miller, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Throughout her book Lepore's implicit question remains always: Don't these Tea Party people realize how silly they are? They don't understand history; they need to learn that time moves forward. 'We cannot go back to the eighteenth century,' she says, 'and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.' ---Gordon S. Wood, New York Review of Books, Lepore's graceful grasp of both history and reality is important. 'The past haunts us all,' Lepore writes. 'But time moves forward, not backward. Chronology is like gravity. Nothing falls up. We cannot go back to the eighteenth century, and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.' --Martin F. Nolan,San Francisco Chronicle, "Tackling the present, the near present, and the far-away past in one small volume, Lepore has not only penned an indictment of the Tea Party's crimes against history, she's also working in the tradition of Hofstadter, helping edge the academy closer to the public arena. And remaining a card-carrying historian, churning out intricate studies like New York Burning , Lepore has continued to step outside the safe boundaries of the ivory tower. At the risk of being accused of dilettantism, she's even tried her hand at historical fiction, co-authoring Blindspot in 2008. Now she's given journalism a go, making the case that Lepore is a better reporter than any historian, and a better historian than any reporter." --Samuel P. Jacobs, Daily Beast, In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore's liberal perspective is obvious although she largely sticks to history. Readers will find no expos of an 'astroturf' movement funded by billionaire libertarians. What they will find is a trenchant, lively and devastating meditation on the uses and abuses of American history, most recently by the tea partiers. . . . Lepore counters what she assails as 'historical fundamentalism' (which, in the words of a chapter title, places 'the past upon its throne') with rich, if roaming, portraits of an American Revolution that she clearly loves. Thus, the book will have enduring value beyond the upcoming election. -- Steven P. Miller, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, For both teachers and students, Lepore's meditation serves as a valuable reminder that the craft of history is inevitably a political act in which we navigate both the realities and, according to Lepore, the 'tyranny of the past.', Lepore's graceful grasp of both history and reality is important. 'The past haunts us all,' Lepore writes. 'But time moves forward, not backward. Chronology is like gravity. Nothing falls up. We cannot go back to the eighteenth century, and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.', "Writing with verve, wit, and careful attention to detail, Lepore systematically contrasts their use of Revolutionary imagery and ideas with documented facts. She provides a detailed yet disturbing portrait of a populist faction advocating devolution towards a society that would have excluded all of the Tea Party's own members. Yet, Lepore's goal is not to make this association look foolish, but to cast a critical light on all organizations, public as well as private, who misuse the past for their own selfish goals. For that reason alone, this is an important work for all Americans."-- Choice, Writing with verve, wit, and careful attention to detail, Lepore systematically contrasts their use of Revolutionary imagery and ideas with documented facts. She provides a detailed yet disturbing portrait of a populist faction advocating devolution towards a society that would have excluded all of the Tea Party's own members. Yet, Lepore's goal is not to make this association look foolish, but to cast a critical light on all organizations, public as well as private, who misuse the past for their own selfish goals. For that reason alone, this is an important work for all Americans. -- Choice, "Jill Lepore is a national treasure. There is no other writer so at home both as a trenchant scholar of American history and as an on-the-scene observer of our present-day follies. She etches the connection between past and present with a wisdom, grace, and sparkle that makes this book even harder to put down--if that's possible--than her previous work." --Adam Hochschild, author of Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire's Slaves, For a number of years, the author has been contributing pieces to the New Yorker on American colonial history, pithy commentaries shaped by historical evidence and a storyteller's hand. Here she braids those essays together, which makes them more satisfying and meaningful than if they were merely collected in an anthology. . . . The author is not smug in her treatment of the Tea Partiers, but she refuses to allow them to kidnap and torture history so that it is reduced to fit their fundamentalist mold. . . . Learned, lively and shrewd. -- Kirkus Reviews, Recommended as an engaging, well-informed picture of a complex society suffering under a repressive regime and the subject of often unbalanced debate about American policy. -- Elizabeth Hayford, Library Journal, Jill Lepore, a historian of the American Revolution and a staff writer at The New Yorker , has written a brief but valuable book, The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle Over American History , which combines her own interviews with Tea Partiers (mostly from her home state, Massachusetts) and her deep knowledge of the founders and of their view of the Constitution., Writing with verve, wit, and careful attention to detail, Lepore systematically contrasts their use of Revolutionary imagery and ideas with documented facts. She provides a detailed yet disturbing portrait of a populist faction advocating devolution towards a society that would have excluded all of the Tea Party's own members. Yet, Lepore's goal is not to make this association look foolish, but to cast a critical light on all organizations, public as well as private, who misuse the past for their own selfish goals. For that reason alone, this is an important work for all Americans., "Lepore mounts an obvious argument, but does so in a way that is eminently readable, shows flashes of wit, and punctures with fact the magical thinking that she justly terms 'historical fundamentalism.' The book's accessible, sensible history of a period prone to wild misrepresentation is a valuable contribution, and Lepore has ably reinforced that contribution in her journalism for the New Yorker and the New York Times --such as her recent, pleasing attack on Paul Ryan's budgetary demagoguery." --Feisal Mohamed, Huffington Post, "Tackling the present, the near present, and the far-away past in one small volume, Lepore has not only penned an indictment of the Tea Party's crimes against history, she's also working in the tradition of Hofstadter, helping edge the academy closer to the public arena. And remaining a card-carrying historian, churning out intricate studies like New York Burning , Lepore has continued to step outside the safe boundaries of the ivory tower. At the risk of being accused of dilettantism, she's even tried her hand at historical fiction, co-authoring Blindspot in 2008. Now she's given journalism a go, making the case that Lepore is a better reporter than any historian, and a better historian than any reporter."-- Samuel P. Jacobs, Daily Beast, Lepore's graceful grasp of both history and reality is important. 'The past haunts us all,' Lepore writes. 'But time moves forward, not backward. Chronology is like gravity. Nothing falls up. We cannot go back to the eighteenth century, and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.' ---Martin F. Nolan, San Francisco Chronicle, Winner of the 2011 Gold Medal in History, Independent Publisher Book Awards Winner of the 2010 Bronze Medal Book of the Year Award in History ForeWord Reviews A New York Times Book Review Editors' Choice for 2010 One of U.S. News & World Report 's (online version) Top Debate Worthy Books of the Year for 2010 A Boston Authors Club Annual Awards Highly Recommended Book for 2011 Honorable Mention for the 2010 PROSE Award in U.S. History, Association of American Publishers, "For a number of years, the author has been contributing pieces to the New Yorker on American colonial history, pithy commentaries shaped by historical evidence and a storyteller's hand. Here she braids those essays together, which makes them more satisfying and meaningful than if they were merely collected in an anthology. . . . The author is not smug in her treatment of the Tea Partiers, but she refuses to allow them to kidnap and torture history so that it is reduced to fit their fundamentalist mold. . . . Learned, lively and shrewd."-- Kirkus Reviews (starred review), "Lepore mounts an obvious argument, but does so in a way that is eminently readable, shows flashes of wit, and punctures with fact the magical thinking that she justly terms 'historical fundamentalism.' The book's accessible, sensible history of a period prone to wild misrepresentation is a valuable contribution, and Lepore has ably reinforced that contribution in her journalism for the New Yorker and the New York Times --such as her recent, pleasing attack on Paul Ryan's budgetary demagoguery."-- Feisal Mohamed, Huffington Post, "Lepore's acerbic wit (and its accompanying soul, brevity) makes The Whites of Their Eyes (Princeton, 206 pages, $19.95) a welcome change of pace from the 900-page biographies of George Washington now straining bookstore shelves across the country."-- Matthew Buckingham, Willamette Week, Lepore, a Harvard University historian and writer for the New Yorker , has a good ol' time shooting fish in a barrel. But by far the most interesting and biting parts of her story come not from cleaning up messy and false tea party tales of the olden days, nor from her parallel account of the leftist history promoted by activists during the nation's bicentennial in the 1970s. What Lepore does best is rescue forgotten people and moments from the Revolutionary era and remind us beautifully of the many-layered power of place. In some ways, this little book is not so much about the tea party and American history as about richly knowing a city, in this case Boston. To know a city through time, to look at a spot and know what once stood there is among the most intense--and often ironic--urban pleasures. Lepore conveys this beautifully. ---Stephan Salisbury, Philadelphia Inquirer, "Lepore's graceful grasp of both history and reality is important. 'The past haunts us all,' Lepore writes. 'But time moves forward, not backward. Chronology is like gravity. Nothing falls up. We cannot go back to the eighteenth century, and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.'" --Martin F. Nolan, San Francisco Chronicle, "For both teachers and students, Lepore's meditation serves as a valuable reminder that the craft of history is inevitably a political act in which we navigate both the realities and, according to Lepore, the 'tyranny of the past.'" --Richard L. Hughes, Teaching History, "Jill Lepore, a historian of the American Revolution and a staff writer at The New Yorker , has written a brief but valuable book, The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle Over American History , which combines her own interviews with Tea Partiers (mostly from her home state, Massachusetts) and her deep knowledge of the founders and of their view of the Constitution."-- Alan Brinkley, New York Times Book Review, In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore reviews the history of the American Revolution--in order to explore, and explode, the way the 21st-century Right uses that history. She criticizes history-according-to-the-Tea-Party on two levels. First, and unsurprisingly, she finds that the Tea Party's description of the past is simply incorrect at many turns. More interesting is Lepore's second criticism. In their asking the (unanswerable) question, 'What would the Founders do?', the Tea Party invites people to have a very strange relationship with the past: 'People who ask what the founders would do quite commonly declare that they know, they know, they just know what the founders would do, and, mostly, it comes to this: if only they could see us now, they would be rolling over in their graves. . . . We have failed to obey their sacred texts, holy writ,' Lepore writes provocatively. 'That's not history. It's not civil religion, the faith in democracy that binds Americans together. It's not originalism or even constitutionalism. That's fundamentalism.' -- Lauren Winner, Books & Culture, "In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore reviews the history of the American Revolution--in order to explore, and explode, the way the 21st-century Right uses that history. She criticizes history-according-to-the-Tea-Party on two levels. First, and unsurprisingly, she finds that the Tea Party's description of the past is simply incorrect at many turns. More interesting is Lepore's second criticism. In their asking the (unanswerable) question, 'What would the Founders do?', the Tea Party invites people to have a very strange relationship with the past: 'People who ask what the founders would do quite commonly declare that they know, they know, they just know what the founders would do, and, mostly, it comes to this: if only they could see us now, they would be rolling over in their graves. . . . We have failed to obey their sacred texts, holy writ,' Lepore writes provocatively. 'That's not history. It's not civil religion, the faith in democracy that binds Americans together. It's not originalism or even constitutionalism. That's fundamentalism.'"-- Lauren Winner, Books & Culture, Jill Lepore, a historian of the American Revolution and a staff writer at The New Yorker , has written a brief but valuable book, The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle Over American History , which combines her own interviews with Tea Partiers (mostly from her home state, Massachusetts) and her deep knowledge of the founders and of their view of the Constitution. ---Alan Brinkley, New York Times Book Review, "Recommended as an engaging, well-informed picture of a complex society suffering under a repressive regime and the subject of often unbalanced debate about American policy."-- Elizabeth Hayford, Library Journal, Recommended as an engaging, well-informed picture of a complex society suffering under a repressive regime and the subject of often unbalanced debate about American policy., Throughout her book Lepore's implicit question remains always: Don't these Tea Party people realize how silly they are? They don't understand history; they need to learn that time moves forward. 'We cannot go back to the eighteenth century,' she says, 'and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.', Lepore mounts an obvious argument, but does so in a way that is eminently readable, shows flashes of wit, and punctures with fact the magical thinking that she justly terms 'historical fundamentalism.' The book's accessible, sensible history of a period prone to wild misrepresentation is a valuable contribution, and Lepore has ably reinforced that contribution in her journalism for the New Yorker and the New York Times --such as her recent, pleasing attack on Paul Ryan's budgetary demagoguery. ---Feisal Mohamed, Huffington Post, "Lepore's graceful grasp of both history and reality is important. 'The past haunts us all,' Lepore writes. 'But time moves forward, not backward. Chronology is like gravity. Nothing falls up. We cannot go back to the eighteenth century, and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.'"-- Martin F. Nolan, San Francisco Chronicle, Winner of the 2011 Gold Medal in History, Independent Publisher Book Awards Winner of the 2010 Bronze Medal Book of the Year Award in History ForeWord Reviews A New York Times Book Review Editors Choice for 2010 One of U.S. News & World Report 's (online version) Top Debate Worthy Books of the Year for 2010 A Boston Authors Club Annual Awards Highly Recommended Book for 2011 Honorable Mention for the 2010 PROSE Award in U.S. History, Association of American Publishers, Throughout her book Lepore's implicit question remains always: Don't these Tea Party people realize how silly they are? They don't understand history; they need to learn that time moves forward. 'We cannot go back to the eighteenth century,' she says, 'and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.' -- Gordon S. Wood, New York Review of Books, "Writing with verve, wit, and careful attention to detail, Lepore systematically contrasts their use of Revolutionary imagery and ideas with documented facts. She provides a detailed yet disturbing portrait of a populist faction advocating devolution towards a society that would have excluded all of the Tea Partys own members. Yet, Lepores goal is not to make this association look foolish, but to cast a critical light on all organizations, public as well as private, who misuse the past for their own selfish goals. For that reason alone, this is an important work for all Americans."-- Choice, "Lepore, a Harvard University historian and writer for the New Yorker , has a good ol' time shooting fish in a barrel. But by far the most interesting and biting parts of her story come not from cleaning up messy and false tea party tales of the olden days, nor from her parallel account of the leftist history promoted by activists during the nation's bicentennial in the 1970s. What Lepore does best is rescue forgotten people and moments from the Revolutionary era and remind us beautifully of the many-layered power of place. In some ways, this little book is not so much about the tea party and American history as about richly knowing a city, in this case Boston. To know a city through time, to look at a spot and know what once stood there is among the most intense--and often ironic--urban pleasures. Lepore conveys this beautifully."-- Stephan Salisbury, Philadelphia Inquirer, Lepore mounts an obvious argument, but does so in a way that is eminently readable, shows flashes of wit, and punctures with fact the magical thinking that she justly terms 'historical fundamentalism.' The book's accessible, sensible history of a period prone to wild misrepresentation is a valuable contribution, and Lepore has ably reinforced that contribution in her journalism for the New Yorker and the New York Times --such as her recent, pleasing attack on Paul Ryan's budgetary demagoguery., "For a number of years, the author has been contributing pieces to the New Yorker on American colonial history, pithy commentaries shaped by historical evidence and a storyteller's hand. Here she braids those essays together, which makes them more satisfying and meaningful than if they were merely collected in an anthology. . . . The author is not smug in her treatment of the Tea Partiers, but she refuses to allow them to kidnap and torture history so that it is reduced to fit their fundamentalist mold. . . . Learned, lively and shrewd." -- Kirkus Reviews (starred review), Lepore mounts an obvious argument, but does so in a way that is eminently readable, shows flashes of wit, and punctures with fact the magical thinking that she justly terms 'historical fundamentalism.' The book's accessible, sensible history of a period prone to wild misrepresentation is a valuable contribution, and Lepore has ably reinforced that contribution in her journalism for the New Yorker and the New York Times --such as her recent, pleasing attack on Paul Ryan's budgetary demagoguery. -- Feisal Mohamed, Huffington Post, "In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore's liberal perspective is obvious although she largely sticks to history. Readers will find no expos of an 'astroturf' movement funded by billionaire libertarians. What they will find is a trenchant, lively and devastating meditation on the uses and abuses of American history, most recently by the tea partiers. . . . Lepore counters what she assails as 'historical fundamentalism' (which, in the words of a chapter title, places 'the past upon its throne') with rich, if roaming, portraits of an American Revolution that she clearly loves. Thus, the book will have enduring value beyond the upcoming election." --Steven P. Miller, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, " The Whites of Their Eyes isn't a screed of any kind, and the text is refreshingly free of ire. It is, instead, a warning shot across the bow. To tea-party activists of today, Ms. Lepore seems to be saying, 'Tighten up your game.' In its current iteration, the tea-party is a feat of storytelling. But in order to gain a foothold in American politics, it must aspire to more than that." --Molly Young, Economist.com, For a number of years, the author has been contributing pieces to the New Yorker on American colonial history, pithy commentaries shaped by historical evidence and a storyteller's hand. Here she braids those essays together, which makes them more satisfying and meaningful than if they were merely collected in an anthology. . . . The author is not smug in her treatment of the Tea Partiers, but she refuses to allow them to kidnap and torture history so that it is reduced to fit their fundamentalist mold. . . . Learned, lively and shrewd., "In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore's liberal perspective is obvious although she largely sticks to history. Readers will find no exposé of an 'astroturf' movement funded by billionaire libertarians. What they will find is a trenchant, lively and devastating meditation on the uses and abuses of American history, most recently by the tea partiers. . . . Lepore counters what she assails as 'historical fundamentalism' (which, in the words of a chapter title, places 'the past upon its throne') with rich, if roaming, portraits of an American Revolution that she clearly loves. Thus, the book will have enduring value beyond the upcoming election."-- Steven P. Miller, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, "Lepore, a Harvard University historian and writer for the New Yorker , has a good ol' time shooting fish in a barrel. But by far the most interesting and biting parts of her story come not from cleaning up messy and false tea party tales of the olden days, nor from her parallel account of the leftist history promoted by activists during the nation's bicentennial in the 1970s. What Lepore does best is rescue forgotten people and moments from the Revolutionary era and remind us beautifully of the many-layered power of place. In some ways, this little book is not so much about the tea party and American history as about richly knowing a city, in this case Boston. To know a city through time, to look at a spot and know what once stood there is among the most intense--and often ironic--urban pleasures. Lepore conveys this beautifully." --Stephan Salisbury, Philadelphia Inquirer, Lepore's acerbic wit (and its accompanying soul, brevity) makes The Whites of Their Eyes (Princeton, 206 pages, $19.95) a welcome change of pace from the 900-page biographies of George Washington now straining bookstore shelves across the country. ---Matthew Buckingham, Willamette Week, The Whites of Their Eyes is a fascinating attempt to raise the level of US public policy debate. It is also a critique of the uses of history in politics and a brief, informative account of the ordinary people who lived at the time of the American Revolution. [It] is a valuable contribution to current discussions of public policy and should be read by anyone interested in serious political debate. ---John Michael Senger, ForeWord Reviews, Recommended as an engaging, well-informed picture of a complex society suffering under a repressive regime and the subject of often unbalanced debate about American policy. ---Elizabeth Hayford, Library Journal, Lepore, a Harvard University historian and writer for the New Yorker , has a good ol' time shooting fish in a barrel. But by far the most interesting and biting parts of her story come not from cleaning up messy and false tea party tales of the olden days, nor from her parallel account of the leftist history promoted by activists during the nation's bicentennial in the 1970s. What Lepore does best is rescue forgotten people and moments from the Revolutionary era and remind us beautifully of the many-layered power of place. In some ways, this little book is not so much about the tea party and American history as about richly knowing a city, in this case Boston. To know a city through time, to look at a spot and know what once stood there is among the most intense--and often ironic--urban pleasures. Lepore conveys this beautifully. -- Stephan Salisbury, Philadelphia Inquirer, Lepore's acerbic wit (and its accompanying soul, brevity) makes The Whites of Their Eyes (Princeton, 206 pages, $19.95) a welcome change of pace from the 900-page biographies of George Washington now straining bookstore shelves across the country., The Whites of Their Eyes is a fascinating attempt to raise the level of US public policy debate. It is also a critique of the uses of history in politics and a brief, informative account of the ordinary people who lived at the time of the American Revolution. [It] is a valuable contribution to current discussions of public policy and should be read by anyone interested in serious political debate. -- John Michael Senger, ForeWord Reviews, " The Whites of Their Eyes shows Jill Lepore at her remarkable best--accessible, authoritative, and wise." --Jeffrey Toobin, author of The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court, "In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore reviews the history of the American Revolution--in order to explore, and explode, the way the 21st-century Right uses that history. She criticizes history-according-to-the-Tea-Party on two levels. First, and unsurprisingly, she finds that the Tea Party's description of the past is simply incorrect at many turns. More interesting is Lepore's second criticism. In their asking the (unanswerable) question, 'What would the Founders do?', the Tea Party invites people to have a very strange relationship with the past: 'People who ask what the founders would do quite commonly declare that they know, they know, they just know what the founders would do, and, mostly, it comes to this: if only they could see us now, they would be rolling over in their graves. . . . We have failed to obey their sacred texts, holy writ,' Lepore writes provocatively. 'That's not history. It's not civil religion, the faith in democracy that binds Americans together. It's not originalism or even constitutionalism. That's fundamentalism.'" --Lauren Winner, Books & Culture, "In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore's liberal perspective is obvious although she largely sticks to history. Readers will find no exposé of an 'astroturf' movement funded by billionaire libertarians. What they will find is a trenchant, lively and devastating meditation on the uses and abuses of American history, most recently by the tea partiers. . . . Lepore counters what she assails as 'historical fundamentalism' (which, in the words of a chapter title, places 'the past upon its throne') with rich, if roaming, portraits of an American Revolution that she clearly loves. Thus, the book will have enduring value beyond the upcoming election." --Steven P. Miller, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, "Throughout her book Lepore's implicit question remains always: Don't these Tea Party people realize how silly they are? They don't understand history; they need to learn that time moves forward. 'We cannot go back to the eighteenth century,' she says, 'and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.'"-- Gordon S. Wood, New York Review of Books, The Whites of Their Eyes isn't a screed of any kind, and the text is refreshingly free of ire. It is, instead, a warning shot across the bow. To tea-party activists of today, Ms. Lepore seems to be saying, 'Tighten up your game.' In its current iteration, the tea-party is a feat of storytelling. But in order to gain a foothold in American politics, it must aspire to more than that. ---Molly Young, Economist.com, "Lepore mounts an obvious argument, but does so in a way that is eminently readable, shows flashes of wit, and punctures with fact the magical thinking that she justly terms historical fundamentalism. The books accessible, sensible history of a period prone to wild misrepresentation is a valuable contribution, and Lepore has ably reinforced that contribution in her journalism for the New Yorker and the New York Times --such as her recent, pleasing attack on Paul Ryan's budgetary demagoguery."-- Feisal Mohamed, Huffington Post, "Lepore's acerbic wit (and its accompanying soul, brevity) makes The Whites of Their Eyes (Princeton, 206 pages, $19.95) a welcome change of pace from the 900-page biographies of George Washington now straining bookstore shelves across the country." --Matthew Buckingham, Willamette Week, In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore's liberal perspective is obvious although she largely sticks to history. Readers will find no exposé of an 'astroturf' movement funded by billionaire libertarians. What they will find is a trenchant, lively and devastating meditation on the uses and abuses of American history, most recently by the tea partiers. . . . Lepore counters what she assails as 'historical fundamentalism' (which, in the words of a chapter title, places 'the past upon its throne') with rich, if roaming, portraits of an American Revolution that she clearly loves. Thus, the book will have enduring value beyond the upcoming election. -- Steven P. Miller, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, " The Whites of Their Eyes is a fascinating attempt to raise the level of US public policy debate. It is also a critique of the uses of history in politics and a brief, informative account of the ordinary people who lived at the time of the American Revolution. [It] is a valuable contribution to current discussions of public policy and should be read by anyone interested in serious political debate."-- John Michael Senger, ForeWord Reviews, Tackling the present, the near present, and the far-away past in one small volume, Lepore has not only penned an indictment of the Tea Party's crimes against history, she's also working in the tradition of Hofstadter, helping edge the academy closer to the public arena. And remaining a card-carrying historian, churning out intricate studies like New York Burning , Lepore has continued to step outside the safe boundaries of the ivory tower. At the risk of being accused of dilettantism, she's even tried her hand at historical fiction, co-authoring Blindspot in 2008. Now she's given journalism a go, making the case that Lepore is a better reporter than any historian, and a better historian than any reporter. -- Samuel P. Jacobs, Daily Beast, For both teachers and students, Lepore's meditation serves as a valuable reminder that the craft of history is inevitably a political act in which we navigate both the realities and, according to Lepore, the 'tyranny of the past.' -- Richard L. Hughes, Teaching History, Jill Lepore, a historian of the American Revolution and a staff writer at The New Yorker , has written a brief but valuable book, The Whites of Their Eyes: The Tea Party's Revolution and the Battle Over American History , which combines her own interviews with Tea Partiers (mostly from her home state, Massachusetts) and her deep knowledge of the founders and of their view of the Constitution. -- Alan Brinkley, New York Times Book Review, Lepore's acerbic wit (and its accompanying soul, brevity) makes The Whites of Their Eyes (Princeton, 206 pages, $19.95) a welcome change of pace from the 900-page biographies of George Washington now straining bookstore shelves across the country. -- Matthew Buckingham, Willamette Week, The Whites of Their Eyes is a fascinating attempt to raise the level of US public policy debate. It is also a critique of the uses of history in politics and a brief, informative account of the ordinary people who lived at the time of the American Revolution. [It] is a valuable contribution to current discussions of public policy and should be read by anyone interested in serious political debate., "In The Whites of Their Eyes , Lepore's liberal perspective is obvious although she largely sticks to history. Readers will find no expos of an 'astroturf' movement funded by billionaire libertarians. What they will find is a trenchant, lively and devastating meditation on the uses and abuses of American history, most recently by the tea partiers. . . . Lepore counters what she assails as 'historical fundamentalism' (which, in the words of a chapter title, places 'the past upon its throne') with rich, if roaming, portraits of an American Revolution that she clearly loves. Thus, the book will have enduring value beyond the upcoming election."-- Steven P. Miller, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, " The Whites of Their Eyes offers a lesson in what history actually is and how it seems constantly to be used and abused. Lepore is a superb writer." --Eric Foner, author of Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877, "Recommended as an engaging, well-informed picture of a complex society suffering under a repressive regime and the subject of often unbalanced debate about American policy." --Elizabeth Hayford, Library Journal, "For both teachers and students, Lepore's meditation serves as a valuable reminder that the craft of history is inevitably a political act in which we navigate both the realities and, according to Lepore, the 'tyranny of the past.'"-- Richard L. Hughes, Teaching History, Lepore's graceful grasp of both history and reality is important. 'The past haunts us all,' Lepore writes. 'But time moves forward, not backward. Chronology is like gravity. Nothing falls up. We cannot go back to the eighteenth century, and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.' -- Martin F. Nolan, San Francisco Chronicle, "Throughout her book Lepore's implicit question remains always: Don't these Tea Party people realize how silly they are? They don't understand history; they need to learn that time moves forward. 'We cannot go back to the eighteenth century,' she says, 'and the Founding Fathers are not, in fact, here with us today.'" --Gordon S. Wood, New York Review of Books, The Whites of Their Eyes isn't a screed of any kind, and the text is refreshingly free of ire. It is, instead, a warning shot across the bow. To tea-party activists of today, Ms. Lepore seems to be saying, 'Tighten up your game.' In its current iteration, the tea-party is a feat of storytelling. But in order to gain a foothold in American politics, it must aspire to more than that. -- Molly Young, Economist.com, The Whites of Their Eyes isn't a screed of any kind, and the text is refreshingly free of ire. It is, instead, a warning shot across the bow. To tea-party activists of today, Ms. Lepore seems to be saying, 'Tighten up your game.' In its current iteration, the tea-party is a feat of storytelling. But in order to gain a foothold in American politics, it must aspire to more than that., "Writing with verve, wit, and careful attention to detail, Lepore systematically contrasts their use of Revolutionary imagery and ideas with documented facts. She provides a detailed yet disturbing portrait of a populist faction advocating devolution towards a society that would have excluded all of the Tea Party's own members. Yet, Lepore's goal is not to make this association look foolish, but to cast a critical light on all organizations, public as well as private, who misuse the past for their own selfish goals. For that reason alone, this is an important work for all Americans." -- Choice, "This book gives an informed account of the ways contemporary references to the Revolution ignore, distort, run roughshod over, yet somehow attempt seriously to evoke the events of the past. It nicely represents Lepore's distinctive genius as a historian." --Jack N. Rakove, author of Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution, " The Whites of Their Eyes is a fascinating attempt to raise the level of US public policy debate. It is also a critique of the uses of history in politics and a brief, informative account of the ordinary people who lived at the time of the American Revolution. [It] is a valuable contribution to current discussions of public policy and should be read by anyone interested in serious political debate." --John Michael Senger, ForeWord Reviews
Copyright Date
2011
Topic
Christianity / Protestant, United States / Revolutionary Period (1775-1800), Fundamentalism, Political Process / Political Advocacy, United States / 21st Century, Political Process / Political Parties, Political Ideologies / Conservatism & Liberalism
Lccn
2010-030251
Dewey Decimal
973.3/115
Intended Audience
College Audience
Dewey Edition
22
Genre
Religion, History, Political Science
Objectbeschrijving van de verkoper
Informatie van zakelijke verkoper
BargainBookStores.com
Ralf Scharnowski
3423 Lousma Dr SE
49548 Grand Rapids, MI
United States
Ik verklaar dat al mijn verkoopactiviteiten zullen voldoen aan alle wet- en regelgeving van de EU.
De verkoper neemt de volledige verantwoordelijkheid voor deze aanbieding.
eBay-objectnummer:363385952652
Verzending en verwerking
Objectlocatie:
Grand Rapids, Michigan, Verenigde Staten
Wordt verzonden naar:
Wereldwijd
Uitgesloten:
APO/FPO, Afrika, Alaska/Hawaï, Amerikaanse protectoraten, Azië, Barbados, Brazilië, Frans-Guyana, Frans-Polynesië, Guadeloupe, Libië, Martinique, Midden-Oosten, Nieuw-Caledonië, Oceanië, Oekraïne, Russische Federatie, Réunion, Venezuela, Zuidoost-Azië
| Verzending en verwerking | Elk volgende object | Tot | Service | Levering*Zie opmerkingen over levering |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gratis verzending | Gratis | Verenigde Staten | Standard Shipping | Geschatte levering tussen do, 9 mei en di, 14 mei tot 43230 |
| Verwerkingstijd |
|---|
| Wordt doorgaans binnen 5 werkdagen na ontvangst van betaling verzonden. |
| Belasting |
|---|
| Er kunnen belastingen van toepassing zijn tijdens Betalen. Meer weten?Lees meer over het betalen van belastingen op eBay-aankopen. |
Btw voor objectnr.363385952652
Btw voor objectnr.363385952652
Verkoper berekent btw op objecten die naar de volgende staten worden verzonden:
| Staat/provincie | Btw-tarief |
|---|
Retourbeleid
| Nadat u het object hebt ontvangen, kunt u contact opnemen met de verkoper binnen | Terugbetaling wordt verstrekt als | Kosten voor retourzending |
|---|---|---|
| 30 dagen | Geld terug | Verkoper betaalt voor retourzending |
De verkoper is verantwoordelijk voor de kosten van de retourzending.
| Details retourbeleid |
|---|
| Retourzendingen geaccepteerd |
Betalingsgegevens
Betalingsmethoden
Ingeschreven als zakelijke verkoper
Feedback verkoper (1.227.015)
c***e (294)- Feedback gegeven door koper.
Afgelopen maand
Geverifieerde aankoop
Fantastic!!!!! Top Notch Seller!!!!! Thanks
3***a (59)- Feedback gegeven door koper.
Afgelopen maand
Geverifieerde aankoop
As described!!
v***r (1342)- Feedback gegeven door koper.
Afgelopen maand
Geverifieerde aankoop
Fast ship, as advertised, smooth transaction, great seller, A+++